Keep in mind, this is only a layman's viewpoint, which I am.
We
are immersed in Einstein's space time continuum. What exactly that represents to my view of a contracting universe is a little more mundane
I suppose, because it implies more of a bound mechanical state.
Our
perspective of the universe lies between the interior wall of our
universe and the exterior wall of the atoms that we're made of. This is
where Einstein's space time exists. Everything becomes regulated by
these two points, including our perception of time and the speed of
light.
As I mentioned in my previous post, we are in
an encapsulated state. Our existence is a virtual particle in a much
greater universe. Following the logic of e=mc^2, I think the speed of
light in the universe beyond our interior wall is C^2. Likewise, I
think the speed of light inside the exterior walls of the atoms we're
made of is √C. That's why e=mc^2. Nature follows a logical pattern,
always.
Everything works from the rate of contraction,
which defines all of our physics. I think naturally time follows the
same pattern, but that perspective follows the opposite path. So the
perception of time beyond our exterior wall is √T, and inside the
exterior walls of atoms time is T^2. C slows exponentially inside
atoms, while time accelerates exponentially.
In our
universe, matter is already traveling at the rate of C inwards. That's
the really strange part about this view that's difficult to wrap your
brain around, but it makes sense. Motion, like time, flows in a single
direction. Time accelerates inwards, while motion accelerates
outwards. This is the core definition of Einstein's space time
continuum. Space and time flow in opposite directions. There are two
arrows, not one. We have an arrow of time, and an arrow of motion.
I
realize this is nothing like you've heard before from the scientific
community, but it's the way I see it. It changes very little of the
underlying theories, but the reality is a profound difference.
Motion
is an illusion of perspectives. It's real enough for us to get from A
to B, but we don't really travel as we perceive motion in the
conventional sense. We're simply resisting omnidirectional contraction
in a directional manner. The faster we travel in any direction the
slower the time, because time and motion are flowing in opposite
directions exponentially. I suppose you could consider them somewhat
stair-stepped, with a range of motion in each step. w-x, x-y, y-z.
This
gives a definitive physical explanation why matter cannot exceed the
speed of light, because we're already traveling at C inwards in an
omnidirectional manner. We can skew our inward motion directionally,
which gives us the illusion (and reality more or less) of lateral
motion, but we can't exceed the inward motion laterally. Lateral motion
is a consequence of skewed inward motion. You can't have one without
the other. It's difficult to explain. Essentially, you can't reduce
your rate of contraction or inward motion, to 0, but you can slow it
down to a point very close to 0. The sum total of your motion is always
equivalent to C.
Motion and time are separate
dimensions, but they're both bound in Einstein's space time continuum. I
may not be explaining this correctly. I get a little confused trying
to understand the definitions of dimensions in human terms and how
they're defined in physics.
One thing that has always
puzzled me is mass-less particles. I've always wondered how they got
to the speed of light so quickly. For instance, you turn on a
flashlight and instantly get a beam of photons. The photons themselves
are ejected from matter. When we observe matter though, things inside
aren't traveling anywhere near C from our perspective. It's always
puzzled me.
It dawned on me that the electrons and
photons are already traveling at C within the shell of an atom. When
they get ejected from matter, they simply adapt to the new limits within
our universe and continue on their way. They never accelerated,
because they simply obeyed the laws of physics once they entered our
relative state.
It all makes sense, to me anyway.
I guess I should clarify, this is a purely mechanical process. Speed is potentially infinite, or instantaneous. The walls that divide us from different relative states impedes the flow of space. It's like loosely putting a lid on a bottle. The walls regulate the natural flow. Our existence is walls within walls within more walls, and so on and so on. Relativity changes with each step inward or outward. We define our physics from our base state, which lies between the interior wall of the universe and exterior wall of atoms. That's what we observe, although I'm not sure we'll ever see the universes wall. I imagine it being somewhat opaque, or possibly reflective in nature. Anything outside our universe would be outside of our range of detection.
No comments:
Post a Comment