Matter & Motion

Keep in mind, this is only a layman's viewpoint, which I am.

We are immersed in Einstein's space time continuum.  What exactly that represents to my view of a contracting universe is a little more mundane I suppose, because it implies more of a bound mechanical state. 

Our perspective of the universe lies between the interior wall of our universe and the exterior wall of the atoms that we're made of.  This is where Einstein's space time exists.  Everything becomes regulated by these two points, including our perception of time and the speed of light.

As I mentioned in my previous post, we are in an encapsulated state.  Our existence is a virtual particle in a much greater universe.  Following the logic of e=mc^2, I think the speed of light in the universe beyond our interior wall is C^2.  Likewise, I think the speed of light inside the exterior walls of the atoms we're made of is √C.  That's why e=mc^2.  Nature follows a logical pattern, always.

Everything works from the rate of contraction, which defines all of our physics.  I think naturally time follows the same pattern, but that perspective follows the opposite path.  So the perception of time beyond our exterior wall is √T, and inside the exterior walls of atoms time is T^2.  C slows exponentially inside atoms, while time accelerates exponentially.

In our universe, matter is already traveling at the rate of C inwards.  That's the really strange part about this view that's difficult to wrap your brain around, but it makes sense.  Motion, like time, flows in a single direction.  Time accelerates inwards, while motion accelerates outwards.  This is the core definition of Einstein's space time continuum.  Space and time flow in opposite directions.  There are two arrows, not one.  We have an arrow of time, and an arrow of motion.  

I realize this is nothing like you've heard before from the scientific community, but it's the way I see it.  It changes very little of the underlying theories, but the reality is a profound difference. 

Motion is an illusion of perspectives.  It's real enough for us to get from A to B, but we don't really travel as we perceive motion in the conventional sense.  We're simply resisting omnidirectional contraction in a directional manner.  The faster we travel in any direction the slower the time, because time and motion are flowing in opposite directions exponentially.  I suppose you could consider them somewhat stair-stepped, with a range of motion in each step.  w-x, x-y, y-z.  

This gives a definitive physical explanation why matter cannot exceed the speed of light, because we're already traveling at C inwards in an omnidirectional manner.  We can skew our inward motion directionally, which gives us the illusion (and reality more or less) of lateral motion, but we can't exceed the inward motion laterally.  Lateral motion is a consequence of skewed inward motion.  You can't have one without the other.  It's difficult to explain.  Essentially, you can't reduce your rate of contraction or inward motion, to 0, but you can slow it down to a point very close to 0.  The sum total of your motion is always equivalent to C.    

Motion and time are separate dimensions, but they're both bound in Einstein's space time continuum.  I may not be explaining this correctly.  I get a little confused trying to understand the definitions of dimensions in human terms and how they're defined in physics. 

One thing that has always puzzled me is mass-less particles.  I've always wondered how they got to the speed of light so quickly.  For instance, you turn on a flashlight and instantly get a beam of photons.  The photons themselves are ejected from matter.  When we observe matter though, things inside aren't traveling anywhere near C from our perspective.  It's always puzzled me.

It dawned on me that the electrons and photons are already traveling at C within the shell of an atom. When they get ejected from matter, they simply adapt to the new limits within our universe and continue on their way.  They never accelerated, because they simply obeyed the laws of physics once they entered our relative state.

It all makes sense, to me anyway.

This is a purely mechanical process.  Speed is potentially infinite, or instantaneous.  The walls that divide us from different relative states impedes the flow of space.  It's like loosely putting a lid on a bottle.  The walls regulate the natural flow.  Our existence is walls within walls  within more walls, and so on and so on.  Relativity changes with each step inward or outward.  We define our physics from our base state, which lies between the interior wall of the universe and exterior wall of atoms.  That's what we observe, although I'm not sure we'll ever see the universes wall.  I imagine it being somewhat opaque, or possibly reflective in nature.  Anything outside our universe would be outside of our range of detection.

There is one thing a little weird, time doesn't really slow with acceleration, it expands with mass.  Consider the speed of light in our universe 1.  Time is frequency.  I think it's reasonable to assume acceleration alters frequency, which alters our perception of time.  The longer the frequency, the slower the time, and the shorter the frequency the faster the time.  If we were to accelerate to C, our frequency would match our velocity, so both values would become 1.  Time is not stopped, it's simply at the maximum range of perception, which is essentially out of our range.  It's not stopped though, and that's what's important to consider.  Shorter frequencies are closer to 0, longer frequencies are closer 1.  Motion rises from 0 to 1, while time frequencies expand from 0 to 1.  Time and motion are bound.